| |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
![]() ![]() |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Most Dangerous City Rankings Updated January 05, 2010 In the 2009 Most Dangerous City rankings, issued by CQ Press, Camden was ranked as the Most Dangerous City with a population over 75,000. The official policy of the American Society of Criminologists is in opposition to the use of these rankings. The 2009 rankings are based on 2008 crime data. Read the December 30th Courier Post article detailing the decline in Homicides in Camden. Camden Most Dangerous City Rankings*
* Note that each year's ranking is based on the previous year's crime data. So, for instance, the ranking for 2005 was based on 2004 data.
The FBI cautions against ranking cities based solely on the UCR data for several reasons, namely that rankings don't consider any contextual factors in particular areas that may lead to a higher rate of certain crimes. The United States Conference of Mayors has also questioned the validity of the Most Dangerous Rankings in a 2007 reportThese rankings are based on the Federal Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) data reported by local police departments to the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). Morgan-Quitno developed its own formula to compare cities using these rankings, which appears to have been continued by CQ Press. The 2008-2009 CQ Press ranking methodology can be found here.
Previous Analysis Prepared by CAMConnect This analysis by CAMConnect described why Camden ranked atop the “Most Dangerous” list for the second consecutive year. It also includes data illustrating the decline in crime reported in Camden during 2005 and discussion about the city’s potential rank for 2006, assuming Morgan-Quitno's methodology remained the same. There are several important points to remember about the rankings:
As a non-profit, non-partisan organization, CAMConnect takes no position on the merits of the Morgan-Quitno rankings, and this document should not be construed as an endorsement of any position related to the methodology of the rankings. However, given the media attention that the rankings generate, CAMConnect believes it is important to provide some additional context about how the rankings are developed.
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||